Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian REITS, Trusts & Dividend Stocks -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gg cox who wrote (4762)	11/8/2002 8:07:09 PM
From: Peter W. Panchyshyn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 11633

Wow that post got you really cranked up...here it is again and you put up any chart you want of NT and answer the question. -------- I countered your posted chart. It doesnt reflect what a holder of an NT share was seeing as his own. Its wrong plain and simple because it doesnot reflect and is not adjusted for the splits that have occured. I gave the corrected table for my strategies calculation purposes in my reply to you as supplied by a well respected and authentic data provider FP DATAGROUP. That table shows most definitely that that Doctor and other starting to accumulating at $80 and $60 that they did that in or near the high range for the stock as those prices from the table for the year '99 is just too far out of whack with the previous years values. Thats a big warning sign to stay away. Again from my table 1999 --- high 74.95 -------- Using your method show me where you would have started to accumulate NT on weakness 5 years ago ..10 years ago or whenever? ---- The more important thing is where most definitely you would not be a buyer and that is for certain in 1999 at that 74.95. And it is important because you say I or someone following my method would have started accumulating there. Thats not the case pure and simple. And I proved that with my table take a look. That 74.95 is so far out of whack of the previous yearly numbers posted. You dont need the math to see that. Its plain as day just follow the yearly values up from thet table I provided you.------- ---- You cant see for yourself that that referenced graph from YAHOO FINANCE doesnt reflect properly the splits that have occurred. What really happened per one share wise. Just how are you going to follow the math of it. As YAHOO demonstrates its financial data / charts is just full of holes. Recheck what it says about PWI.UN. Other data providers like Telenium are worse they show on their chart for PWI.UN a 400% gain in one day. Now once again as I stated in response to your own examples of that Doctor or that other person the table shows those prices you say they started buying at are too high. And that is something my strategy says not to buy at. That is all I need to provide to show you that your criticism of my strategy is not valid. You said my strategy would be accumulating at those high prices it would not. So so much for the basis of your attack to it. ------ If you wish you can do the math of my strategy yourself ( AS I STATED CLEARLY ITS REGRESSION ANALYSIS) you have the references (I GAVE THAT) you have already some of the data (I GAVE THAT IN THE TABLE PROVIDED) you can get the rest easily enough. You can post your results for all to see . I'll gladly correct any errors. As I have corrected the errors you and others have already made throughout all these past postings. All With real trust fact real trust data real past trading numbers and real time follow through and real time results. Like that NT gain from $0.67 to over $2.------ Part of My goal here has been to describe my strategy (which I have clearly done on several occassions) and to show its results. I leave it in the hands of others to test and verify to their hearts content. And decide for themselves. My goal here has not been to do your work for you while you can sit back on your ass and reap its benefits.--------- Sighhh and "crying like a baby"LOL ----- Thats exactly what you have been doing. Thats what those guys from those examples you gave have been doing. Whats the matter having a hard time to dispute the simple math of it. Once again , 300% - 90% = 210%. Thats a 210% gain. You cant understand that how are you going to understand anything else. Anything else like the math of my strategy. --------------