To: NightOwl who wrote (9039 ) 11/9/2002 4:53:51 PM From: niceguy767 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14464 NightOwl: I saw the Barron's article today (not Sunday, I might add)...They did reference the new developments in memory and TXN's involvement, but missed their opportunity for a major scoop, by excluding any mention of RMTR...Perhaps they're hoping to pick up some inexpensive RMTR shares before liftoff??? (Not gonna happen, as the church lady says!!!) Somehow, I don't think WSJ will miss RMTR's involvement in this frontier-breaking development in memory evolution between now and Tuesday (not Monday, I might add) when NY resumes activity and RMTR opens at $3.50 or better on expanding volume... It remains difficult to believe that a 22 million share company having just demonstrated positive earnings (even in this difficult market!!!) and looking forward to a near term annual very conservative revenue growth rate of 30% and optimistically, but not impossibly a 100% annual revenue growth rate (even in this difficult market!!!), and having just been publicly endorsed by TXN as holding the keys to the currently evolving new memory frontier, would have any shares for sale below $7.00!!! It seems to me that there must be at least 50 funds out there (Tera Corp is already in), who if they understood the story, would each be happy to take a "1 Meg" share position in RMTR...just a matter of a small amount of time until this "best kept secret" in the marketplace (RMTR, for any newbies in our midst)is "unmasked" by the likes of the popular financial media... Heck, NightOwl...I wouldn't have thought there would be 750,000 shares (3% of outstanding, 20%(???) of float) available for purchase under $3.50...Who the heck would sell under $7.00 today and under $27 come Oct. 07/03 and under $77 come December 25, 2004??? P.S. Concerning: "P.S. Concerning:messages.yahoo.com ; Where are those pesky, gnarly field fauna when an elicited (solicited, even)response is required, anyway???