SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (154721)11/12/2002 4:43:40 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580154
 
The very absence of a clear American interest made what Clinton did in the Balkans sort of noble

Oh, I get it. We shouldn't attack Iraq unless they attack us ON AMERICAN SOIL first -- I think you said that a while back. Further, the fact that there IS a clear American national security interest in Iraq makes it a less legitimate target than the Balkans, because we didn't have a national security interest there.

You're really cooking now ... making some real sense now, Al...

But it was not pre-emptive

Iraq isn't really pre-emptive either. Although, a time has come when we must act pre-emptively in order to preserve the things that thousands of Americans have died for in the past. It is appropriate.



To: Alighieri who wrote (154721)11/13/2002 6:24:36 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1580154
 
The very absence of a clear American interest made what Clinton did in the Balkans sort of noble.

So its ok to push around other countries as long as we get no benefit from doing so, but if we are looking out for our own interests its automatically wrong??

Tim