Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (154780)	11/13/2002 1:47:06 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583406

If he avoids war I will give him credit and vote for him next time around. a) I don't believe you. b) Hasn't he done everthing conceivable in his effort to avoid war? You and Helen Thomas keep accusing him of "wanting" to go to war, yet he has taken extraordinary steps preciesely to avoid it. You and every other liberal had already proclaimed Bush to be determined to go to war, before the negotiations ever began. We are, today, precisely where we were trying to get to -- where we were before Clinton allowed Saddam to deny access to inspectors without repercussion. If a war happens, it will be because Saddam didn't live up to HIS commitment. I just don't see that you have anything to complain about. Once again, Bush has "threaded the needle".

To: Alighieri who wrote (154780)	11/13/2002 1:55:38 PM
From: d[-_-]b	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583406

Alighieri, re:Do you think Cheney and Rumsfeld will let him? Cheney and Rumsfeld are just two voices, does it really matter what they think if Saddam disarms fully? You do understand Bush must go to the UN again to make the case that Saddam has not complied with the resolution before he can act.