Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MSI who wrote (426)	11/13/2002 4:30:53 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Bush also has supported an investigation. Yes, had he not done that, or stonewalled questions, he should have been booted. So not pushing the idea that an investigation should be launched is a crime? If you arguing for impeachment the standard is "high crimes and misdemeanors". We had a clear-cut war to fight, without any hanky-panky on the part of those bringing the war to us So the fight against Al-Qaida is not a war? 9/11 was not casus belli? What evidence due you have of any "hanky-panky" by the Bush administration that led to or even allowed for 9/11? That is an extraordinary claim and as such should require an extraordinary level of evidence. but mealy-mouthed excuses for failing in continuing variety of ways to capture "the real killers" We have captured or killed a whole lot of Al-Qaida. Getting all of the senior leadership or the majority of the rank and file is not something that anyone could reasonably expect was in the cards. These people are not idiots and its a big world out there for them to hide in. Tim