Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Castle -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MSI who wrote (437)	11/13/2002 4:41:03 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Democrats are currently null and void. Everyone knows that. Well, at least you're an equal opportunity politician hater...

To: MSI who wrote (437)	11/13/2002 4:47:04 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7936

Read prior posts, the words "bona-fide military secrets". Well, the problem is that one man's "bona-fide military secret" is another man's "conspiracy theory". It seems to me the current system, under which whoever is president at the time calls the shots, works fairly well. For all the talk and accusation of Bush's "secrecy", I can't think of a single instance where anyone was harmed by a Bush secret. It really isn't worth getting one's panties in a wad over... You see the problem? That creates an all-powerful central government. Honestly, this is a truly silly position. The administration doesn't lie; that's really enough for me. I really don't need to know who Bush met with before setting his energy policy. All I really need to know is I like it or I don't. If you have honest politicians, as I'm convinced the Bush administration is, you really don't have to worry about the kind of crap that went on during the Clinton years.