SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (154826)11/13/2002 6:01:59 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578933
 
RE:"It's really hard for you to look at Reagan as maybe being the real culprit, huh? Its so easy to hang it on Clinton since he's already dirtied himself. I suggest you look at Reagan's two terms more closely. You'll find a lot that smells up the joint"

At appears that you were born about the time of Reagans first term. You have an amazing memory of that time frame.

Jim



To: tejek who wrote (154826)11/13/2002 6:36:18 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1578933
 
Ted,

See my reply to Al here:
siliconinvestor.com

My point was about the Blame America for everything ideology. As far as Clinton is concerned regarding 9/11, I think it is more about what he did not do, not what he did. If he indeed did something decisive about the real enemy - Bin Laden (rather than dealing with make-believe enemies), I think we would hear from Als of the world, because there is a real resistance on the left about fighting real enemies of America, be it communists or radical muslims (and to some extend Saddam). I think this is because in their hearts, they believe that America is evil, and therefore there must be something good about enemies of America.

Joe