SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: donald sew who wrote (6063)11/24/2002 8:00:58 AM
From: Steve Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10157
 
If you want to see some question evading from Da_cheif aka Don Wolonchuk, here I am asking him if he is paid to promote VLNC. I ask him several times. Each reply is a joke or an insult or just nonsense:

Message 18250676

And previously, he asked me to look at his public record, which I did and presented in this next post. His reply was insults and then to ban me from his thread:

Message 16938929



To: donald sew who wrote (6063)11/24/2002 11:03:20 AM
From: Win-Lose-Draw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10157
 
he promoted for a fine bunch of crooks whose names you might even recognize as they got popped big-time in a well-publicized operation called "Bermuda Shorts".

he has subsequently threatened to have me booted from SI, to drag me into court, yada yada yada. of course, none of it has happened. i keep his threatening PMs around for when i need a good laugh.



To: donald sew who wrote (6063)11/24/2002 11:25:38 PM
From: da_cheif™  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10157
 
sew...i need not remind you that the wexlers of this world are a dime a duzen...follow this thread...ive been there before....
Message 14479256



To: donald sew who wrote (6063)11/25/2002 11:26:36 AM
From: GraceZ  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 10157
 
If you accuse someone of doing something illegal I think the burden is on the accuser to provide evidence and I have yet to read any conclusive evidence of da_cheif being a paid promoter. You and WLD are turning it around and telling Don Wolanchuk it's up to him to provide proof of his innocence. How many times do you think he should give an answer to that kind of accusation? It's been asked and answered.

The sad truth is most don't care if they accuse an innocent person and most people reading will believe the accusation without any proof what-so-ever. Such is the ignorance of the average reader on the Internet. Repeat it frequently enough and as far as most are concerned it's true whether it is or not.