Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (67796)	11/25/2002 12:02:42 AM
From: Solon	Respond to of 82486

"I wonder if you know how odd this is." I think a part of her understands. But the most part is unable to see the disconnect. I have said before that she has arrested emotional development. I stand behind that opinion...

To: E who wrote (67796)	11/25/2002 12:21:12 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

Why now E? I know too much confidential information about you and Edwarda and many other people here to join into an expedition into the past with any enthusiasm. I don't feel cleansed by "apologies" in the same way you do, so I have to be a little more careful in my responses. If I overstep I don't feel an apology makes it all better. And of course I haven't saved NEARLY the number of Pm's and posts that you have. I would offer to pursue the matter in PM, but my experiences with you and PM "disagreements" has not been positive, to say the least. I will be happy to discuss the present, but not the past. I answered your previous post more fully than you deserve. That will have to do you. Now as to the rules on SI- I have an interest in the rules on SI- not about the aliases who violate the rules. It's a game and there are rules. The rules are there to be used. If you violate the TOU you deserve to get terminated, shut down, or suspended. It's just a part of the game.

To: E who wrote (67796)	11/25/2002 1:40:45 AM
From: Solon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

"Now as to the rules on SI- I have an interest in the rules on SI- not about the aliases who violate the rules. It's a game and there are rules. The rules are there to be used. If you violate the TOU you deserve to get terminated, shut down, or suspended. It's just a part of the game." Life is just a "game" to her. She doesn't care about the people--just the "rules". Bu the rules are predicated on the actions and the rights of real live people. Something is seriously screw-- up in her head, E. This is the kind of sickness you read about in the paper--always to somebody else in a different county. No wonder she thought that the ugliness against poet was just "entertainment". It is really getting freaky as she starts to expose her "I DON'T CARE" with a sneer of defiance. I wonder why she is unable to care for other people? She uses the internet as an excuse and a rationale for her "entertainment" against Edwarda and others. And it is important enough for her psychologically to spend a great deal of time here while pretending that it is "entertainment". Why would anyone be "entertained" by people being hurt--such as Poet was hurt?? Do you know what I have noticed. Her hate for (past friend) Poet is palpable. And Poet is noted on SI for being a "feeling" sort of person. X hates people who show feelings. Why is that? She has trained herself to hate feelings, and to "NOT CARE". But why?? I think she hates her own feelings and that is why she never talks about feelings, but only about "I don't care" and "IMO" and "I can't possibly know what you mean. You might think you know what I mean; but you can't possibly know--" NOBODY CAN GET TO KNOW X........"THE UNKNOWN." Truly bizarre...