SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Current Events and General Interest Bits & Pieces -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zonder who wrote (101)11/25/2002 6:01:22 PM
From: ~digs  Respond to of 603
 
FBI: Hate Crimes Vs. Muslims Rise
Nov 25, 4:12 PM (ET); By CURT ANDERSON

WASHINGTON (AP) - Muslims and people who are or appear to be of Middle Eastern descent were reported as victims of hate crimes more often last year than ever before, a consequence of the fear and suspicion that followed the Sept. 11 terror attacks, the FBI said Monday.
. . .
The FBI's annual hate crimes report found that incidents targeting people, institutions and businesses identified with the Islamic faith increased from 28 in 2000 to 481 in 2001 - a jump of 1,600 percent. Muslims previously had been among the least-targeted religious groups.
. . .
Hate crimes against people because of their ethnicity or national origin - those not Hispanic, not black and not Asian or American Indian - more than quadrupled from 354 in 2000 to 1,501 in 2001. This category includes people of Middle Eastern origin or descent.
. . .
Overall allegations of crime motivated by hate rose just over 17 percent from 2000 to 2001, from 8,063 to 9,730 incidents...

more stats @ apnews.myway.com



To: zonder who wrote (101)11/26/2002 9:59:37 AM
From: Win Smith  Respond to of 603
 
Garry Wills, Goodbye Father': The Vanishing Priesthood nytimes.com

[ On the more conventional religion front, A review of GOODBYE FATHER The Celibate Male Priesthood and the Future of the Catholic Church, By Richard A. Schoenherr. As a lapsed Catholic who went through 12 years of parochial school in the warm afterglow of Vatican II, I like to keep up on the old Mother Church. Though most of the news isn't particularly uplifting these days. Garry Wills is a lot better in the faith department, but he doesn't find the news any better. A relatively brief review, quoted in full. ]

A number of people tried, in the 1980's, to warn America's Catholic bishops that a pedophile scandal was brewing in their church. The Rev. Thomas P. Doyle, a Dominican priest, was a co-author of a report for the annual meeting of the bishops in 1985, warning that settlement of molestation suits could mount to a billion dollars in time. Cardinal Joseph Bernardin of Chicago submitted a proposal for the same meeting, recommending that a research project be undertaken to gauge the extent of the problem and the best ways to respond to it. Both proposals were rejected by the National Conference of Catholic Bishops. They would have come under the aegis of Cardinal Bernard Law, who was then the head of the conference's Committee on Research and Pastoral Practice. A conservative monsignor from Massachusetts told me, at last June's meeting of the American bishops, ''These guys are kicking themselves that they listened to Law and not Bernardin back then.''

The bishops' pattern of denial greeted another report from the 1980's, this one on the declining numbers of priests. Richard A. Schoenherr, a demographic sociologist at the University of Wisconsin, addressed the bishops on that subject. Cardinal Roger Mahony of Los Angeles reacted to Schoenherr's gloomy statistics by writing, in Our Sunday Visitor (Nov. 18, 1990) that ''the Catholic Church in our country has been done a great disservice by the Schoenherr report,'' since ''our future is shaped by God's design for His Church -- not by sociologists.'' The cardinal used his own projections to deny Schoenherr's description of decline in the Los Angeles dioceses during the next four years. But at the end of that period, there were 31 fewer priests in Los Angeles than Schoenherr had predicted as ''most likely'' -- the sociologist had underestimated the decline by 6 percent.

In 1993, Schoenherr and one of his graduate students, Lawrence A. Young, published their findings in the Social Demography Series of the University of Wisconsin, Madison, under the title ''Full Pews and Empty Altars.'' It won the Distinguished Book Award from the Society for the Scientific Study of Religion. The authors, after charting the decline in priests (19 percent) from 1966 to 1984, had predicted as most likely a 40 percent decline in American priests over the years 1966 to 2005. Though this projection was dismissed by many analysts, Young demonstrated in 1998 that the projection for the preceding 10 years had proved accurate to within 1 percent. His and Schoenherr's track record is very good.

To respond to claims that the decline is merely temporary, Schoenherr began a huge study using models from the social sciences to see how organizations respond to hostile environments, and how (if ever) they succeed in defying them rather than adapting to them -- in this case, how the church will fare in responding to a world environment that has altered many of the assumptions on which the celibate priesthood was based, assumptions about the meaning of sex, asceticism, psychology, marriage, the family, women, professionalism, community, accountability, education, urbanization, natural law, biblical theology and other relevant factors.

Change in one or a few of these areas might be compatible with continuing mandatory celibacy as an essential element in the priesthood, but dissonance across the whole range of them makes the old position unsustainable. Therefore he predicts that priestly celibacy will become voluntary within the lifetime of the current generation and that women will become priests within three or four generations.

Schoenherr finished his study in 1995, but he died in 1996 before making the cuts that publishers were demanding in his giant manuscript. His widow commissioned one of his ex-students, David Yamane, an assistant professor of sociology at the University of Notre Dame, to edit the work. ''Goodbye Father'' is dated in places -- as when Schoenherr treats Archbishop Rembert Weakland of Milwaukee as a prophet with important future influence; Weakland later discredited himself by secretly paying off with church funds an adult homosexual lover. But otherwise this book is as convincing in its analysis as the earlier one was in its statistics.

Schoenherr's focus is on the priesthood in America, but he refers peripherally to a situation that is regularly misrepresented by conservative Catholics -- the numbers of priests in the developing world. They claim that seminaries are full there, and will even supply a surplus of priests for the declining West. They rely not on absolute numbers but on percentage increases in indigenous seminaries after the withdrawal of missionary priests from colonial countries. To double or triple formerly modest outputs there does nothing to solve the fact that the Southern Hemisphere is where the priest shortage is greatest. In the United States, the number of priests per 10,000 faithful declined from 12.9 in 1965 to 9.8 in 1990. In the same period the priests per 10,000 in Africa declined from 5.4 to 2.3, and in Latin America from 2.3 to 1.4. Any gains made in recent years do not come even remotely close to closing that gap. No wonder Schoenherr can report that bishops in Africa and Latin America have requested Rome's permission to ordain married men in order to fill their imperative need for more priests.

World figures for the priesthood are clear. The Catholic Almanac of 2001 gives the Vatican's own figure of 404,620 priests in 1998. In 1977, the year before John Paul II became pope, the figure was 410,030. Priests have not increased in number, though they have increased dramatically in age, as one would expect where the total was not growing. Meanwhile, 300 million new Catholics came into the world during this pontiff's reign, making the priest-to-faithful disparity ever more serious. The results of this are clear, even in America, which is far better off than Africa or Latin America. Lay Catholic ministers outnumber priests here, and most of these are women, and permanent deacons (male) now number one for every 1.6 parishes. These lay assistants and substitutes are required because of understaffed or nonstaffed parishes. Despite these statistics, some bishops continue to deny that the priest shortage is more than a temporary dip in the demographics. Some dip.



To: zonder who wrote (101)11/26/2002 10:13:41 AM
From: Win Smith  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 603
 
Laura Miller, It's Philip Dick's World, We Only Live in It nytimes.com

[ on a vaguely related metaphysical / epistemological front. Clip: ]

At its best, Dick's fiction captures the depredations of what he called, in his great 1965 novel ''The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch,'' ''the evil, negative trinity of alienation, blurred reality and despair'' embodied in the book's title character. Dick described the two central questions posed by his writing as ''What is human?'' and ''What is real?,'' though he never quite nailed down an answer to the latter. Humanity, he felt, was distilled in kindness, compassion, empathy -- the only way to fend off Eldritch's evil trinity. . . .

Of course these writers could as easily have been inspired by the world around them as by Dick's stories and novels; a great speculative writer always extrapolates from the material at hand. What's striking is how early Dick zeroed in on those ideas. In 1968 (1968!) he opened the novel ''Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?'' with a husband and wife bickering over the proper use of their ''Penfield mood organs,'' gizmos that allow them to fine-tune their personalities. ''My schedule for today lists a six-hour self-accusatory depression,'' the wife announces, much to her husband's annoyance. He suggests she set the mood organ to 888, ''the desire to watch TV, no matter what's on it.''

Aldous Huxley used the idea of chemical mood control even earlier, in ''Brave New World,'' but Dick took speculative fiction's rarefied thought experiments and integrated them into the humble fabric of everyday life. As weird as his work can be, it's always grounded in the lives of Willy Lomanesque working stiffs -- late on the rent, nagged by their wives and just trying to get by. In his own life, Dick alternated between the 1950's ideal of a nuclear family and a freer but chaotic demimonde; that tension between midcentury suburbia and our liberationist impulses preoccupies us still. Like Dick's characters, we take comfort in vicarious glamour. The bored and miserable Mars colonists in ''Stigmata'' spend all their time playing with Barbie-like dolls. Using a drug called Can-D, they can transport themselves into the dolls and briefly become gorgeous young people who drive Jaguars, revel in seaside trysts and otherwise savor a life in which it's ''always Saturday.''

The controlling powers in Dick's futuristic worlds are more often huge corporations than governments. ''Stigmata'' is essentially the story of a cosmic battle for market share; in ''Ubik,'' metaphysical salvation comes in a spray can. Dick's most distinctive contribution to the literature of paranoia was his refusal of the conspiracy theorist's secret comfort: better a world manipulated by sinister agents than a universe governed by no intelligence at all. The great terror of Dick's books is entropy -- the cold, dusty, random creep of decay and disorder, blindly devouring each insignificant human life. Anyone on the bad side of the free market can recognize this combination of pervasive power and utter mindlessness. Remember what the prophet said: kindness is our only hope.