Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (68332)	11/26/2002 10:15:58 AM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Good one and then on the other hand maybe I just like to watch indecent people, convinced they are decent, going to great lengths to prove they are, what they are.

To: one_less who wrote (68332)	11/26/2002 11:17:09 AM
From: The Philosopher	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 82486

In connection with my discussion with Neo (with an aside from Karen), how much responsibility does the pushee bear for not simply walking away? It's not the same as the drunk, who physically loses self control as alcohol affects him or her physically. Here, the pushee has to make a conscious decision each time to hit the respond button, type their response, and hit the submit button, and if they don't uncheck preview, hit it twice. What degree of responsibility does the pushee bear? If there is contributory negligence, what is the percentage of blame on each side?