Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: The Philosopher who wrote (68575)	11/26/2002 10:01:42 PM
From: one_less	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

Yes. If to a normally cognizant human being, that behavior should have been too obvious and caused alarm bells to go off. But if you add that you would change the premise and it would change some other things like, wouldn't the dupe enter into the same fear/victim role as the teller at that point? I don't see any other reason for an honest person to follow through with it. So we have to ask what his level of responsibility is at that point. I think being uninformed initially is the key to it and once informed if his life was at risk, he is no more culpable than the teller.