Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (155533)	12/2/2002 6:06:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1578552

David, <You want nuclear proliferation, or you want the United States to put its foot down and stop it. You can't have it both ways.> I think he's working from the assumption that nukes are out there, and there's nothing America can do about it. Pandora's Box has already been opened. That doesn't mean the nuclear club should be any less exclusive. But believing that America can single-handedly stop nuclear proliferation is folly. Look at our awkward relationship with Pakistan, for example. Tenchusatsu

To: i-node who wrote (155533)	12/2/2002 7:35:43 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578552

What more can Bush do? I want him to shut up and follow the path which he himself set forth through the UN. I want him to let the inspectors do their jobs without interference from the black house. I want him to give a chance to a peaceful solution and I want him to stop embarassing the US. What more DO YOU want Iraq to do? They are allowing unimpeded inspections and have said that they would comply with the UN resolution. Where is the basis for what Bush said today? Al