Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (324925)	12/2/2002 11:44:10 PM
From: TideGlider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Einstein said that there is no preferred frame of reference,now suppose i am holding a bucket full of water and rolling it vertically,since there is no preferred frame i can consider the bucket full of water as my frame of reference and stationary,so now according to Einstein the whole cosmos is moving with repect to my bucket,Round and Round.but the water inside the bucket moves in a fashion that shows that bucket IS moving. does that mean that Einstein has gone wrong somewhere?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (324925)	12/3/2002 12:19:46 AM
From: PROLIFE	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Who has had more profound effect on every aspect of this world and life since Jesus?? NO one. Jesus rose from the dead... prove He did not.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (324925)	12/3/2002 2:24:05 AM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Science is based on fact and experiment to verify such facts.... Hmm... That's funny (not). I keep hearing different scientific conclusions every few years or so about things like hormone replacement therapy, high-carbohydrate diets, phen phen, mastectomy effectiveness, etc. As a once would-be scientist who reads the news, I would postulate that you might well be full of shi*. "Science" has become politicized and appears likely to become more so. Diseases like HIV and cancer have become political causes, over and above subjects of scientific inquiry.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (324925)	12/3/2002 7:21:58 AM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

So quickly you reduce this discussion to name calling, and I'm certainly not surprised since your argument is completely bankrupt... you fail to realize that science is its own religion along with its rigid rights and rituals... I wonder how you manage to tie your own shoe laces in the morning... GZ