Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : My House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3755)	12/5/2002 9:40:48 AM
From: Lane3	Respond to of 7689

"This site is currently unavailable. " I found an alternate site. Pretty interesting. bosz.its.tudelft.nl

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (3755)	12/5/2002 10:35:16 AM
From: thames_sider	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7689

Ah, but I don't choose the country then match my answers to fit - that would be backwards. So I wouldn't do that. If given the choice of where to live, without the test, I would put Canada or NZ very high, and the Scandanavian countries would also rank highly. The US would be lower, but still high, and the UK lower still (we're too small and crowded, it limits optimism too much). Never thought about the Baltics... I suppose they might be nice soon, but not for another decade or so, even Estonia. IMO. The drawback with our ex-colonies is of course the huge chip nearly all carry on their shoulders, the incredible envy of and teenage repulsion from the mother country... <g>? Oh, and I'd miss the history. I'd never thought of Bhutan. Like, for any reason. I'd loathe the wet heat anywhere tropical/equatorial, especially if it's worse than Houston in May.