Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (60871)	12/10/2002 11:35:50 AM
From: aladin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

JohnM, For someone who has not yet admitted that the NY Times is a biased organization, you sure seem to spend a lot of time bashing the Washington Times. Why don't we all agree on a set of publications that are reasonable? My proposal: Washington Post Newsweek CS Monitor Any ideas? John

To: JohnM who wrote (60871)	12/10/2002 12:52:00 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

My take...Washington Times...published by the Moonies.......serious issue with no easy or simple answer... minority bashing... it's complicated and it takes folks who care about students to untangle them. Boy, I really struck a nerve, didn't I? It was a short piece that shows how bad the White Liberal Guilt has got. It is "Bashing" the Administration, not the students. You are so sensitive on the issue that you respond by first attacking the publication and saying that "a serious issue with no easy or simple answer. As I say far too often, it's complicated and it takes folks who care about students to untangle them." It is a very simple issue, John. You don't segregate. It's the Law. Ask yourself, "what group of people used to say things like this all the time?" And when you do you will realize that Academia has become the Modern Segregationists.