SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jcky who wrote (61069)12/11/2002 11:55:07 AM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It would have been well within the Iraqi capability to arm the Scuds with either chemical or biologic weapons to disrupt either the Americans, Israelis, or Saudis. This did not occur.

During the air campaign alone, yes. But we cannot know (at least without finding a witness) if Saddam gave the orders for chemical warheads when the Americans invaded. Arming chemical weapons must be done by trained technicians shortly before they are fired, from what I have read. We may simply have overrun the Iraqi positions before the munitions could be armed.

That's just one possible interpretation. Arguably, the point can also be made the war hawks are leaning over backwards to give Saddam the worst of all possible interpretation of events in order to sell a war. The authors are trying to read into the mind of a man, not an exact science. No clear answers here

No matter how you slice it, considering the results of Saddam's little adventures (and the article you cited omitted some of them, like the attempt to reinvade Kuwait in 1994), you can hardly avoid the conclusion that Saddam is prone to aggression and wild miscalculation.



To: jcky who wrote (61069)12/11/2002 12:14:32 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500
 
Yemen Demands Missiles From Korean Ship

story.news.yahoo.com



To: jcky who wrote (61069)12/11/2002 3:17:23 PM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 281500
 
* The University of Chicago's John J. Mearsheimer is interviewed by Chicago Public Radio's World View program...

wbez.org

This is an excellent interview that took place on Monday. It takes about 30 seconds to get into it and it lasts around 1/2 hour...He is a big believer in 'the vigilant containment' of Iraq and still feels that there is less than a 20% chance we may end up going to war -- this is explained in the interview.

______________________________________

*John J. Mearsheimer is the R. Wendell Harrison distinguished service professor of political science at the University of Chicago, where he codirects the Program in International Security Policy. He is the author of The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W. W. Norton, 2001).



To: jcky who wrote (61069)12/11/2002 8:17:34 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
It's true that no one has a crystal ball that will show what will happen in the future. And no one can predict with 100% certainty what Saddam will do after he has nuclear weapons. But one thing we can know is that counting on Saddam to be deterrable is taking a VERY big risk. If that risk is avoidable, wouldn't it be advisable to act to avoid it?