Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (67077)	12/11/2002 3:32:12 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 70976

"So this is my country. We were invaded on 9/11 by Islamic terrorists" And you propose to invade all countries with Muslim majorities in revenge? NO In the absence of ANY proof that Iraq was in ANY way involved in 9/11? Do you need to be reminded that those were Saudi citizens who made darts out of Boeings? NO Or that Bin Ladin is not Iraqi but Saudi? NO I NEVER SAID OR IMPLIED ANY OF THAT. IN THAT POST I WAS TALKING ABOUT AL QUAIDA IN AFGANISTAN AND BWACS JUSTIFICATION OF SELF DEFENSE IF IRAQ USED GAS/BIO ON INVADERS AND WHETHER THAT SHOULD HAVE ENABLED US TO NUKE THEM. I DIDNT SAY THAT IT SHOULD ALTHOUGH I ONCE MADE A POST THAT SAID A SMALL NUKE DEEP UNDERGROUND THAT HAD NO CIVILIAN CASUALTIES SHOULD BE USED IF IT KILLED BIN LADEN AND CREW. BWAC AGREES WITH ME BECAUSE HE HAS SAID IT IS OK FOR IRAQ TO USE WMD ON THEIR SOIL TO DEFEND AGAINST US OR AT LEAST HE IMPLIED THAT.