Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: michael97123 who wrote (67087)	12/12/2002 6:09:08 AM
From: zonder	Respond to of 70976

Mike - If I did not respond to that post, it is because I realized the futility of going over the same things over and over again. If you are really dying for answers, here they are: Message 18321119 1) I already said (quite a few times) that I will not answer that question. I am not asking you to disclose personal information and you have no right to ask me for mine. 2) You cannot hope to destroy something you do not the causes of. Period. That is so elemental that I cannot believe you are making me say this for the 10th time. It is childish to think you can bomb the hell out of people and hope to end terrorism. It does not work that way. What you are proposing is the sure-fire way to BOOST support for terrorism. She carefully avoids certain questions, certain types of questions Do say which kind. I am all ears. here she is in a principality lecturing us on american foreign policy Is being temporarily based in a Principality for work reasons an obstacle to formulating thoughts of world affairs? Can only American citizens who live in America give comments on American foreign policy? She really doesnt believe we would respond with nukes to a WMD attack Try to understand before you respond. I said (and I repeat) America will never nuke Iraq a la Hiroshima if Saddam gasses the American invaders who drop from planed onto his backyard. It will never happen. And in another breath bush is a maniac I don't think he is a "maniac". He is an ex-alcoholic and cocaine addict, so his judgement is probably a little clouded with addictive personality issues (possibly an explanation for why he sees everything in black and white), and looking at his face when he is making speeches, he does not look especially bright, but I don't think he is a maniac. Unless he has a prepared speech, Bush is quite incoherent, and his unilateral "Fuck'em" attitude is strange for the President of a democratic country, an he is probably controlled by oil companies, but I doubt if he is a maniac. I dont get it at all. I know. These things can get complicated.