Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (61248)	12/12/2002 5:29:33 AM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

You seem to be totally missing the point. Clinton had the US Ambassador sign the treaty AFTER the Senate had passed a resolution NOT TO RATIFY KYOTO. Do you understand the signifigance of that? I know you live in a beachfront feudal fairyland, but try please. Derek

To: zonder who wrote (61248)	12/12/2002 6:37:10 AM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 281500

>>The US signed Kyoto.<< "The US" didn't sign the treaty. An ambassador signed the treaty. It won't be binding until it is signed by a President and ratified by two thirds of the Senate. Even my kids know that, but I wouldn't expect you to, since you never studied US government. >>I cannot believe you call yourself a counsellor.<< One of the things lawyers have to do is tell people things they don't want to hear. Blaming the messenger is a common logical fallacy.