Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bilow who wrote (61335)	12/12/2002 2:11:45 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

The whole thing started because zonder insinuated that we repudiated contractual obligations by setting aside "treaties we had signed". In that context, it was denied that they were "signed", in the sense that a contract would be, i.e., placing us under obligation. Since we are not bound without ratification, there can be no violation in setting aside unratified treaties. Therefore, the initial confusing arose because of zonder's accusatory use of the word "signed".....