To: Ilaine who wrote (61521 ) 12/13/2002 9:51:34 AM From: zonder Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 281500 Objectivity and all that. Ah OK. Sorry I did not realize that the Israeli army and the Israeli Government Spokesman Avi Pazner were the "objective" sources in this conflict. Let's take a look at your "objective" quotes and links: ------------------------------------------------The army said the incursion was aimed at destroying the house of a wanted militant as well as arresting and searching the houses of militants from the hardline Islamic group Hamas. "Unfortunately, there were also some civilian victims," [Israeli Government Spokesman] Pazner said. "We deeply regret those victims. But they are a result of the fact that terrorists hide among the civilian population and try to use them as literally human shields." ------------------------------------------- Your other link is to "Jerusalem Post", another objective source, I guess. Meanwhile, your next link, CBSnews.com is a story dated 8 October 2002 , more than two months ago. Nice one, CB. Very objective news about this recent event, I see. I mean, since you don't think that Muslims are automatically right just because they are Muslim Of course not. You should think that the Jewish sources are automatically right just becuse they are NOT Muslim, either. I took the trouble to read news stories about the event... Hm. Like the one written two months ago? Right....not just the story written by the cousin It is a human account of the events. If you could stand Nadine's posts of Imshin the friendly neighbourhood blogger for so long without once objecting that this is some guy who is obviously biased for one side, I don't see why you cannot stand the account of this guy whose cousins just died.