SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : The Boxing Ring Revived -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (3397)12/13/2002 12:07:11 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 7720
 
considering that the state is only asking for nine months of your time to uphold the sanctity of life

The tone of that statement sounds incredibly cavalier, dismissive, and condescending. Just thought you might like to know. <g> I'm not questioning your point, only that attitude that the statement implies.



To: Neocon who wrote (3397)12/15/2002 9:42:20 PM
From: Lazarus_Long  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 7720
 
except in cases of rape or molestation
Why should an exception be allowed in these cases? It is not the innocent baby's fault that its father was a rapist or a molestor, is it?

Who are you to decide the reasons determining who shall and who shall die?

If a man commits a rape, we are not allowed to kill his children, are we? What is the difference here but that mere 9 months you are so dismissive of?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News