Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (61677)	12/14/2002 4:27:10 AM
From: D. Long	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Good piece. And I think I'll check out his book this spring... His book ''Empire: The Rise and Demise of the British World Order and the Lessons for Global Power'' will be published in the spring by Basic Books. Derek

To: LindyBill who wrote (61677)	12/14/2002 11:46:07 AM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

So what kind of war are we fighting? Lead article from this week's NYT Magazine. December 15, 2002 War Names By NIALL FERGUSON Like some other essays of his, Ferguson fails to distinguish between wars and wars. Wars in explicit self defense or in retaliation for real prospects of real attacks are one thing. But the Bush administration doctrine expands itself further to include attacks against states for which the Bush folk "think" there may be reasons to consder they will attack the US. Putting Iraq under that umbrella is the classic illustration of this mistake. Iraq may belong under another conceptual umbrella, the one Pollack suggests, which is not the one of preemptive attack but oil policy. That's a different argument. Ferguson seems to make the same mistake the Bush folk make which is to insist that all wars now are against "terror."