Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: re3 who wrote (150827)	12/14/2002 3:54:40 PM
From: GST	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

There are always choices. And the toughest choices lie ahead of us. We will have to wait and see what the inspectors find. If the inspectors find nothing (and that is a possibility), then we might have to make up things as a pretext for war. There has only ever been one basis for an invasion of Iraq -- and it is not one that inspectors can do anything about. It is, quite simply, that we cannot tolerate a hostile regime with nuclear CAPABILITY (not even weapons) in the middle of the oil patch. No amount of inspection will ever get at this issue of nuclear CAPABILITY. On the other hand, we ARE tolerating a hostile regime WITH nuclear weapons on the Korean peninsula. Iraq is not just about WMD and it certainly has nothing to do with Kuwait.