Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Prime Minister Jean Chretien -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (370)	12/17/2002 10:20:57 PM
From: Condor	Respond to of 443

Probably useful information if the army ever decides to stage a coup Yeah...a real burning problem.....I'd bet Timothy McVeigh would agree with you. C

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (370)	12/17/2002 11:01:47 PM
From: SofaSpud	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 443

The "innnovation" here is registration of long guns -- rifles and shotguns. Hand guns have been registered in Canada since the 1930s. One of the revelations the government has had is that long guns don't carry unique identifiers. That's a fact that has been glossed over. There are basically two schools of thought in Canada on this issue. The one carrying the day is that somehow this registry will reduce gun crime. Or perhaps that it will let the police know what they're up against when they respond to a domestic incident. Or that when a gun is stolen, you can beat up the gun owner for not having it sufficiently safely stored. The other school of thought is that criminals don't register weapons, and that there's ample opportunity to "import" weapons across our fabled undefended border. And that the registry is the thin edge, promoting confiscation. One of the particularly interesting aspects of the new long gun law is the right of search and seizure -- that the possibility of an unregistered gun allows the authorities to dispense with a warrant. Guess which side I'm on.