Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hmaly who wrote (156552)	12/20/2002 12:59:14 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1583406

Tedd Re..Just because I think OBL is wrong here doesn't change the facts. Doesn't change which facts. It changes your version of the facts, in your claim that Bush Sr was wrong to go into SA in 91 to protect SA from invasion by Iraq. The only reason you have given so far that Bush Sr made a mistake, because that started the events which culminated in 9/'11. However, now you claim it was OBL who made the mistake; ergo Bush Sr was right. Bush Sr wasn't protecting SA; he was using SA as staging area to attack Kuwait. Because he's on the edge, OBL chose to make that a violation of the holy land. Because OBL is nuts does not change the fact that Bush's staging in SA started the chain of events that led to 9/11. <?I>Do I think Bush Sr. is to blame....No; do I think Clinton is to blame.......No; do I think OBL is to blame......emphatically Yes! Then put the blame emphatically where it belongs, on OBL head. Bush Sr was just doing his job. Tell that to D.Ray. When he blames 9/11 on OBL and not Clinton, then I will blame OBL and not Bush Sr. ;~)) ted