Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mistermj who wrote (1256)	12/30/2002 1:53:50 PM
From: zonder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 15987

Yes of course, "love thy neighbour" and all that. I just think the reason not to nuke a neighbor would be different than the ones you gave. However, I think you have lost sight of how we started talking about this subject: Message 18380122 I said no country is dumb enough to nuke a neighbouring country, even if they are bloodthirsty enough. I did not say the risk of poisoning your own land and people is the only reason not to nuke a neighbour. If you have followed this thread a little bit, you might know just how bitterly I am against using nuclear weapons. Chernobyl does not apply to your argument. We were talking about prevailing winds and nuclear fallouts. Just how does Chernobyl NOT apply in this context, pray tell?