Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Policy Discussion Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1527)	1/2/2003 2:59:57 PM
From: Hawkmoon	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15987

Len.. the onus is upon you to document where my logic is faulty.. You personal "revelation" to such is not sufficient.. I've clearly laid out the historically documented facts related to Israeli/Zionist colonization of Palestine... I'm not particularly defending whether it was right or wrong for the British to feel they had the right to permit Jews to colonize the region, over training and educating local inhabitants to develop it themselves. But it's ridiculous to assert that the Jews, who were seen as a pain in the @ss by local British commanders (many of whom were anti-Jewish), just permitted Jews to take whatever land they wanted. And if the UN decided to grant the Jews that extra territory, then you have an issue to take up with them. And if you have an issue with Israelis occupying from which they were attacked, I suggest you take it up with THEM... As far as I'm concerned, the past is now set in stone.. It cannot be changed.. What can be changed is the future... and the point of this thread is to better understand how foreign policy decisions past, present, and future, will shape the world to come.. Hawk