Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (64126)	1/2/2003 9:01:16 PM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"Let me title my post: HANS BLIX REFUSES TO LEAVE BAGHDAD IN HOPES OF AVERTING WAR" "No Room for Logic in Bush Foreign Policy." Speaking of illogic, your idea takes the cake. Furthermore Blix is in NY and plans no visit at all, last i heard. And i take it from your quote below, you think that US did something to cause the WTC attack. I resent that. Perhaps if Hans Blix was on the roof Bin Laden would have called it off. "If you don't wish to see innocent people die--like those who died in the Twin Towers--"

To: PartyTime who wrote (64126)	1/2/2003 11:20:05 PM
From: Karen Lawrence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

There have been any number of petitions signed by hundreds of thousands protesting impending war sent to the WH. Bush - no one else in his family, however - got the smallpox shot, supposedly. Although the threat of smallpox is even less than anthrax. Cheney is having an enormous bombshelter dynamited beneath his house apparently. They seem very intent on war, while most are opposed to war. I liked Maurice Winn's notion that should the US persist in this pre-emptive war, Hussein would surrender his country to the UN pre-empting the pre-emptive war. No purpose will be served by attacking Iraq. Terrorists will rule.