Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (26772)	1/3/2003 1:58:13 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Not what I'm saying at all. The "interview" was a hoax. The dangers are real, though I'm very glad no infrastructure threatening terror took place in '02--this is perhaps a sign that our efforts have worked. Clearly not a reason to let guard down.

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (26772)	1/3/2003 2:14:40 PM
From: energyplay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

One of the off notes was the reference to Kyoto. This is a European concern, not an Arab one.

To: Louis V. Lambrecht who wrote (26772)	1/4/2003 12:12:38 AM
From: Raymond Duray	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 74559

Louis, Here's another excellent site that is dedicated to exposing hoaxes and urban legends: snopes.com Their conclusion? Hoax. ************ What isn't a hoax is that a substantial lie has been told to the American public about what actually transpired on 09/11/01. Here's something that's vastly more credible: news.bbc.co.uk There is a typo in the introduction to this story. The date should read 6/11/02. Other than that, I've seen corroboration of very much of this information from a plethora of sources. Instead of fearing some Islamic fundamentalist fantasies, we ought to be very concerned about who it is that is spreading such nonsense and attempting to soften up the American public for a mis-directed attack on Islam which will miraculously result in an oil windfall for Bush's cronies. Keep your eye on the prize. Or ask yourself if Seneca's words have application in today's world: "Cui prodest scelus is fecit". Peace, Ray