Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PartyTime who wrote (129)	1/5/2003 2:04:24 AM
From: drugstorecowboy	Respond to of 25898

" When he doesn't discover any weapons on him, he then shoots him." Maybe there could be some mitigating circumstances like he found out the guy was trying to hide the last donut and didn't want to share it with the camera crew. Would it be o.k. to off him then?

To: PartyTime who wrote (129)	1/8/2003 2:51:49 AM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 25898

Hi PartyTime; Re: "When he doesn't discover any weapons on him, he then shoots him." Hey, I've been "contained" by the fuzz, and believe me, they were kind of rough. They searched me for weapons, sure enough, didn't find any, and you know what? At the end they didn't shoot me. I understand that this is a common fate for people who get arrested. And a lot of them are discovered with weapons on them, but still, after you put your hands in the air, very few people are shot. And Bush hasn't yet shot anyone, so look for an analogy that doesn't imply a war that hasn't happened. I think that the probability of war is close to zero. Just cause the cop pulls his gun out of his holster doesn't mean that he's going to pull the trigger. -- Carl