SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (337942)1/5/2003 1:02:43 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 769670
 
Bush's #1 ally was Enron. Bushies afraid of this and try to connect Clinton with Enron as a deflection-divesion, their favorite tactic. Spread rumors like this dreck you just posted. Yes Hillary took $200 from Enron for her campaign. Enron gave $250,000 to Lieberman and a few other Democrats got $$, but the VAST majority of Enrons time and money was Bush-related. Most egregious was their part in duping American consumers during the phoyn energy crisis which helped put Bush in office, gave them ammo to attack the environment and scare people that we needed in Cheney's words "1300 new power plants" ASAP, all to be built at tax-payer expense by Halliburton, Duke and B_C's otehr close cronies. To talk about CLinton and Enron in the same sentence while defending Bush is the height of dishonest spin.



To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (337942)1/5/2003 1:09:08 PM
From: American Spirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
On the Clinton economy. Lowest unemployment in our lifetimes, the middleclass uplifted and spending, global economy exciting and uniting, business growth aggressive just the way Reaganites dream of it being, all boats lifted in the rising economy, no sectors left behind. Yes there was extreme exhuberance in the dot-com area in particular, Wall Street becoming a casino more than ever, but every stock-holder had the opportunity for big gains if he/she had sold at the top, and anyone who lost has only himself to blame for thinking markets would rise forever. Yes Clinton did leave us with a surplus which Bush promised to give back to tax-payers. I haven't seen the books, obviously, but both parties touted the surpluses and if they were all lying why are you the only one who knows "the truth"? Which right-wing site did you get this drivel off? Clinton "cooked the booked like Enron"? Then why didn't the GOP congress say anything if that had been true? Why didn't Bush say anything during the 2000 campaign? Why? Because you're lying. Obviously the Bushies are just painfully jealous of the Clinton economy, want to diss Clinton even more than they unfairly have, and as you can see now they dont have a clue how to replicate his economy. If they knew how they'd do it and Bush would get re-elected in a landslide.