Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (338324)	1/6/2003 1:59:33 PM
From: Thomas A Watson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

neo, you are speaking foreign language lingo. That thread of the lefty who thinks he's not. That's an aside. I don't see your logic justifies you use of your terms in a more general context, In your stilted context lingo you can use them any way you want. After 9-11, the scope of disparity of wealth distribution in the middle east and what wealth can buy now, made clear that selective nation building is required for defense. Nation building is a war on poverty and ignorance and that underlies any ability to create an environment to greatly reduce the formation of a critical mass of hidden hate with intent and resources to do harm. It is the magnitude of disparity and size of the top line. Un earned huge discretionary wealth with no goals. intent and resources Pluto buto, pluti and MODO are leftover organizations that may provide help but the wise plan for the solution. The wise look for whatever resources to assist. Skill is the ability to know how to get the requited resources as cheap as possible. Skill is a lot about politics. Defense is about do what is required. So neo I ask, Is critical to the solution that, "all know it is a status quo power or a Revisionist powers" that is required. Neo, what I am suggesting is that when you want to drive a nail into a piece of wood. You just hit the damn nail with a hammer. You can call the hammer anything you want. Does what you call the hammer matter. The discussion of the name of the hammer can make reality ambiguous. This is not commenting on you, but commenting on my sad poor analogy, and extending it to other stuff. In general dems, if they discuss an issue, discuss the names of the hammer. Rush whacks the nail into the wood. Republicans mostly whack the nail into the wood. Some miss sometimes and hit their thumb or another. Dems don't seem to even know what nail is. In a mindless fashion Dems hit themselve and any who attempt to disagree with what they call a hammer. And heaven forbid, if anyone should mention a nail they are a truly evil person. So to me your style is sometimes very inefficient. When I see a clear case of poor logic in your style I point it out. But I speak in a different frame of mind. I did not say better, I said different. To me it is better because I believe it is more efficient. You are free to agree or disagree. But I would not question your honesty. As I said to another. All are free to read all, some, none of what I write. Send money and I will entertain your requests. LOL #reply-18407124 When I read, a major filter is "What are the implications of the facts presented."