SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: TigerPaw who wrote (271)1/6/2003 9:45:22 PM
From: Raymond Duray  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 25898
 
PEACE PROTESTORS IN EASTERN OREGON

Here's a copy of an article that ran in the Eastern Oregonian newspaper in Pendleton, OR on Saturday, January 4th.

Source: eastoregonian.info

PENDLETON — In a basement meeting room of the First Presbyterian Church, 10 people gathered on a recent Sunday
evening to talk about what they can do to stop the United States from waging war on Iraq.

At a time when most folks are worried about immediate concerns like jobs, families and their personal lives, members of Pendleton PeaceNet are trying to raise awareness of U.S. foreign policy they fear will only lead to more violence, terrorism and injustice.

These activists are among a group of about 50 local residents who are part of a growing anti-war movement that has begun to mobilize hundreds of thousands of people around the world. The motivations of the protesters vary. Some believe war is wrong no matter what the circumstances, and that a solution should be sought through peaceful means. Others disagree with the concept of a pre-emptive strike. They don’t like Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein, but they don’t believe waging war will defuse the standoff over the development of chemical weapons.

But all agree the best way to show their opposition is to band together with one voice. “This is not a game,” said Ben Talley, organizer of the group. “Knowing we’re getting closer to war, we want to be ready to use everyone’s energy to speak out.” Beginning last fall, when talk of war began to escalate, the group began evening peace vigils to draw attention to their concerns.

The group gathered one evening each week, standing in front of City Hall, rain or shine, to hold candles and pray for peace. As winter weather set in, they decided to cut back the vigils to twice a month, but added an indoor educational program to give participants a chance to learn more about the growing war crisis and the peace movement that’s forming in response.

The Pendleton peace group is small, but growing, Talley said. And they’re not the only group in eastern Oregon that’s organizing in opposition to war in Iraq. In La Grande, a peace group based at Eastern Oregon University is attracting students and locals alike to its weekly candlelight vigils. And in Bend, a pro-peace group drew about 350 supporters for a rally Oct. 26, and another 150 people for a rally on Veteran’s Day in November.

The Bend peace protests began when one local resident grew alarmed over talk of impending war and started circulating a
petition. Ray Duray, a retired general contractor, said the rallies have helped rural residents who are opposed to war realize they’re not alone. “What I heard from people was, ‘I’m so glad someone put this together, because I was feeling angry and isolated and I didn’t know what to do,” he said.

While the rallies in Bend have been big enough to draw a bit of media attention, peace groups in small, rural communities can hardly hope to achieve the visibility of big-city demonstrations around the world. In October, a rally in Washington, D.C., drew 100,000, and a protest two weeks later in Florence, Italy, drew half a million.
In Pendleton, a candlelight vigil is lucky to draw a couple dozen people.

But assembling people for even a small rally is enough to make a statement, Duray said. Following the success of the Bend rally, he said he received calls from people in small towns like Fossil — population 470 — who are interested in organizing protests.

“Even if it’s just a small, spontaneous group, we represent a much larger community of people who want peace but who aren’t out there on the streets demonstrating,” he said. “We’re the conscience of the country.”


To increase their visibility, Pendleton activists plan to hold a vigil on the same day that a pro-peace rally is planned for Portland — Jan. 18. And on Feb. 16, when protests are set to take place around the world, several members of the group plan to drive to Portland to join a second, larger event. The goal is to show their solidarity with people everywhere who oppose a U.S. war with Iraq, Talley said.

“We’re hoping to inspire people to feel they can use their freedom of speech to make a difference,” he said.



To: TigerPaw who wrote (271)1/6/2003 10:36:36 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Terror Alerts Manufactured?

By Jon Dougherty
WorldNetDaily.com
January 4, 2003

FBI Agents Say White House Scripting 'Hysterics' for Political Effect

Intelligence pros say the White House is manufacturing terrorist alerts to keep the issue alive in the minds of voters and to keep President Bush's approval ratings high, Capitol Hill Blue reports.

The Thursday report said that the administration is engaging in "hysterics" in issuing numerous terror alerts that have little to no basis in fact.

"Unfortunately, we haven't made a lot of progress against al-Qaida or the war on terrorism," one FBI agent familiar with terrorism operations told CHB. "We've been spinning our wheels for several weeks now."

Other sources within the bureau and the Central Intelligence Agency said the administration is pressuring intelligence agencies to develop "something, anything" to support an array of non-specific terrorism alerts issued by the White House and the Department of Homeland Security.

"Most of the time, we have little to go on, only unconfirmed snippets of information," a second FBI agent, who also was not named in the report, said. "Most alerts are issued without any concrete data to back up the assumptions."

Indeed, the most recent terrorism alerts have been issued absent specific threat information. Each of the accompanying warnings comes without any shift in the nation's new color-coded alert system; the current warning level of yellow, or "elevated," has been in place since late September.

Even recent reports regarding five Arab men who may have slipped into the country via Canada using phony identification could be politically motivated, one expert said.

"We have very, very little to support the notion that these five represent any more of a threat than any of the other thousands of people who enter this nation every day," terrorism expert Ronald Blackstone said. "It's a fishing expedition."

On Wednesday, one of the five, a Pakistani jeweler, Mohammed Asghar, was tracked down in Pakistan by The Associated Press. He told reporters there he'd never been to the U.S., though he said he tried once -- two months ago -- to use false documents to get into Britain to find work.

"I imagine the finger pointing has started at the White House," Blackstone said.

On Thursday, President Bush said of the Asghar case: "We need to follow up on forged passports and people trying to come into our country illegally."

"Don't misunderstand, there is a real terrorist threat to this country," another FBI agent told CHB. But, the agent continued, "every time we go public with one of these phony 'heightened state of alerts,' it just numbs the public against the day when we have another real alert."

Last year, the FBI issued alerts that terrorists may attack stadiums, nuclear power plants, shopping centers, synagogues, apartment houses, subways, and the Liberty Bell, the Brooklyn Bridge and other New York City landmarks, reported Knight-Ridder newspapers. The bureau also advised Americans to be wary of small airplanes, fuel tankers and scuba divers.

CHB reported that FBI and CIA sources said a recent White House memo listing the war on terrorism as a definitive political advantage and fund-raising tool is just one of many documents discussing how to best utilize the terrorist threat.

"Of course the White House is going to exploit the terrorism threat to the fullest political advantage," said Democratic strategist Russ Barksdale. "They would be fools not to. We'd do the same thing."

The White House did not return phone calls from WorldNetDaily seeking comment.

Knight-Ridder Newspapers, meanwhile, reported the FBI has never meant for all its warnings and advisories to be made public.

"Everything is being described as a terror alert, and that's not what this stuff is," said Gordon Johndroe, spokesman for the Department of Homeland Security, in a July interview.

But, he added, "if information is becoming public, then we naturally cannot work in a vacuum and pretend like all this information is not becoming public."

"We live in a world of threats; not all of them necessitate a warning," says FBI terrorist warning chief Kevin Giblin, a 27-year veteran of the bureau. He told Knight-Ridder there should be a generally increased level of vigilance, and he looks to the color-coded advisory system -- not the alerts intended for police -- to signal it.

The threat of terrorism may also be helping the White House manage the sagging economy. Officials at home finance giant Freddie Mac said yesterday that the threat of terrorism may have played a role in bringing 30-year mortgage rates down to 5.85 percent, their lowest since an average 5.83 percent in 1965.

"Current issues such as the possibility of military actions abroad, heightened terrorism alerts and an unexpected drop in consumer confidence contributed to the decline in mortgage rates this week," Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac chief economist, told Reuters.

truthout.org



To: TigerPaw who wrote (271)1/6/2003 11:24:13 PM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
What does Von Rumsfeld think of this...?

German TV airs documentary charging American war crimes in Afghanistan

US State Department denounces broadcast

By Stefan Steinberg

The US State Department has reacted angrily to the showing of a
documentary on German television alleging that US soldiers were
involved in war crimes in Afghanistan. The film, Massacre in
Afghanistan—Did the Americans Look On?, was produced by Irish
filmmaker Jamie Doran. It was shown December 18 on one of the main
German public channels—ARD. The 45-minute documentary had
previously been shown by the British Channel 5 and the Italian station
RAI.

Prior to the German broadcast, a spokesman for the US State
Department, Larry Schwartz, declared: “It is a mystery to us why a
respected television channel is showing a documentary in which the facts
are completely wrong and which unfairly depicts the US mission in
Afghanistan.”

In fact, the allegations in Doran’s film have been public for over half a
year and the US government has refused to make any statement or
advance any argument to refute its detailed evidence of complicity by US
soldiers in war crimes. The film makes the point that the Pentagon has
refused numerous requests by Doran for an interview or comment on the
events that it depicts.

<continued>

wsws.org