Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (339710)	1/7/2003 4:57:10 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

That site mistakes indictments with "being investigated". When you're investigated by a witch-hunt it doesn't make you guilty. Mike Espy seems to be the one who was indicted. Now I remember that. And I really have to gag when "accused of rape" is included. Accused by whom? right-wing operatives paying off some bimbo? Larry Flynt is more credible. -- Other that that since Whitewater turned up a big fat zero I wouldn't be talking about this if I were a loyal Republican. It was a shameful chapter in your party's history. I'd let your party's vicious toilet-search be forgotten. On the other hand, many-many high level Reaganites actually WERE indicted. And S+L debacle and Iran-Contra alone should make you think twice before wanting to challenge me there. I say let's gigve Clinton the credit he deserves and leave the guy alone. He's no longer in power anyway so who cares. Like attacking Reagan. Same deal. History now. Except for one thing, dont expect Bush's opposition to give him any slack. What goes around ought to start coming around. Bush is to be held accountable now and held to high standards he promised during his campaign. SO far he's got failing grades.

To: Bill who wrote (339710)	1/7/2003 5:05:42 PM
From: GROUND ZERO™	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

Disgraceful!!! Clinton should be in prison... GZ

To: Bill who wrote (339710)	1/7/2003 5:26:56 PM
From: MulhollandDrive	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769667

quite a record....should go down in history for...i dunno.. somthing.