SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : DON'T START THE WAR -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 12:07:52 PM
From: Bill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
<< you would defend a child molester who claimed to be rightwing. >>

No he wouldn't. (Everyone knows all child molesters are left wing.)



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 1:10:50 PM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 25898
 
Re: the Taliban/al Qaeda/other individuals who died in the storage containers: do you believe that such was incontrovertibly done intentionally, or could it possibly have been an unfortunate consequence of the hasty decisions made under battlefield or near-battlefield conditions?

LPS5



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 2:50:39 PM
From: MulhollandDrive  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 25898
 
racist world view?

you don't know a thing about me OR my world view...

what i said to you, karen lawrence was that the taliban and the northern alliance had a history of barbarism toward each other...

and you, karen lawrence, went into an attack upon our people....our military (by inference).... i am assuming those are the barbaric Americans you were referring to along with our president...are you saying that our military people herded human beings into a closed container and smothered them to death, karen lawrence?

was that done at the behest of our commander in chief, karen lawrence?

you are the most despicable type of liar... as bill has so aptly demonstrated.

your words are out there, karen lawrence, go ahead and lie, spin, twist, become whirling dervish for all i care in your pathetic attempt to backpedal and weasel out of your most vilele and contemptible words. but you cannot, karen lawrence, because they are there..... in black and white...

and any thinking, rational person reads and understands the meaning of your anti-american spewage spoken for no other reason than to denigrate the character of our men and women who are putting their lives on the line in defense of our great country and most specifically our president, who whether you agree with his political views is by all appearances a good and decent man.

well good for you, karen lawrence....this is a free country and you are free to continue to belch up the bile of your hatred for Bush, or any other "non-democrat"...and you are welcome to publicly proclaim that Bush is now leading our country into barbarism.

you can post any manner of vile, dishonest, repugnant statement you like...

it will be for naught..

fortunately, i believe there many more people out there who have not sold their souls to an "ideaology" where the truth is incidental to an agenda...and those people can see through the lies... you've provided the past 2 days just a small glimmer of what it is like to be so blinded by hate that all you can do is hurl invective and conjure up a "barbaric president"....

keep working the big lie, karen lawrence...that seems to suit you too.



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 2:52:41 PM
From: Poet  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Out comes the pipe again. ;-)



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 3:39:45 PM
From: LPS5  Respond to of 25898
 
MulhollandDrive is far from a "racist," by any definition that I'm aware of.

(Re: "...her racist worldview..." siliconinvestor.com

By what logic or definition did you reach that conclusion from this post?

Message 18411817

LPS5



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 3:52:33 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman  Respond to of 25898
 
With your twisted view, you would defend a child molester who claimed to be rightwing

Karen that is simply not true

JlA's would he never support ANY child molester, no matter what their political persuasion

nor was your attack on MD fair or truthful

reading you today has has been a real eye opener

as I am sure it has many reading this thread



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 4:52:47 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 25898
 
Anyone who can state that someone would defend a child molester based on political beliefs *and* state that another person is a racist with absolutely no evidence to support it, deserves a theme song.

I'm sure you wouldn't defend a rapist based on your political beliefs, would you? How about a sexual harasser?

The Karen Lawrence Theme Song

PRETTY VACANT

There's no point in asking us you'll get no reply
I just steam in but I don't decide
I got no reason it's all too much
you'll always find us
Out to lunch !

We're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant
We're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant

Don't ask us to attend cos we're not all there
Oh don't pretend cos I don't care
I don't believe illusions cos too much is real
so stop your cheap comment
cos we know what we feel

We're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant
we're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant
we're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant...now
and we don't care

There's no point in asking you'll get no reply
I just steam in but I don't decide
I got no reason it's all too much
you'll always find me
out to lunch

we're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant
we're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant
we're so pretty oh so pretty
vacant....now
and we don't care

we're pretty
pretty vacant
we're pretty
pretty vacant
we're pretty
pretty vacant
now and we don't care

-Sex Pistols



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/8/2003 9:45:46 PM
From: Rollcast...  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Where did you stand?

Message 18420521



To: Karen Lawrence who wrote (431)1/9/2003 7:38:22 AM
From: LPS5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 25898
 
Re: "[R]acist worldview[s]."

(http://www.siliconinvestor.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=18417478)

By what logic or definition did you reach that conclusion from this post...

Message 18411817

...or this one?

Message 18411698

LPS5