SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Knighty Tin who wrote (213147)1/8/2003 3:11:18 PM
From: Box-By-The-Riviera™  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 436258
 
not to mention..

just how many divvie paying stocks are there? vs how many are not paying...

the yields suck anyway even with the tax cut

even if they pay a divvie, the companies still need to perform or have some basic value that's not unjustifiably sky high.. (which one?)

and... if they are bought, can that move the wilshire 5000 vs the dow?

smoke smoke smoke, choke on a pretsel.

at least the new t secretary won't get blamed. bad bush move!! <g> he owns this gambit 100% plus.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (213147)1/8/2003 3:37:18 PM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 436258
 
KT, I think the dividend exclusion is a great idea but would be happy to limit the amount or phase it out at a certain income level. The retired folks get a pathetic rate of return from savings, t- bills they need a safe source of income. Many have been screwed by the financial predators of Wall St retirees need a safer source of income - dividends don't lie (but they can be eliminated.) mike


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News