Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas M. who wrote (157825)	1/10/2003 6:03:03 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1573941

Yes, and I immediately refuted your example You mean when you explicitly stated that you did NOT refute my example? " Frankly, I have no way to confirm whether the liberal allegation on this matter is correct. " ROFLMAO! He has taken a page from the president.......if you speak boldly, no wonder will remember that you flaked out several months before. However, you've blown his cover and its unlikely he will respond. ted

To: Thomas M. who wrote (157825)	1/10/2003 6:39:43 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1573941

You mean when you explicitly stated that you did NOT refute my example? Like all good liberals, you quoted me out of context. That quote referred to a TINY chunk of my refutation of your allegation. Your complaint against Coulter, and those of other liberals, have consistently bashed her by taking her remarks out of context, or by missing her points altogether -- points that really are far too obvious for persons of normal intellect to have missed. Look, Coulter can be mean-spirited and unduly critical, overly sarcastic, and borderline rude. But there is NOT ONE confirmed instance of her lying. It just isn't there. The items you cited were ALL either clearly refuted or just outright lies by the critic. As an example, take the Couric incident. While it is true she (Couric) was directly quoting the great biographer, Edmund Morris, the fact remains that the way in which she "quoted" him was misleading -- making it sound as though Morris had "thought" Reagan was an "airhead", when Morris' statement was totally contrary to that, effectively nullifying ANY PURPOSE for the quote except to criticize Reagan. This, when Morris' quote was not a critical one, when taken in context. So, the liberals say, "Well, Couric was quoting Morris so anything is okay". Of course, this is the way liberals think -- "don't concern yourself with the facts, look for a loophole". So, as a liberal, one WOULD conclude this was appropriate behavior. But to the rest of the world, Coulter's position was precisely correct -- Couric molded the facts to support her agenda. It is okay, though, becase she is a flaming liberal. If you have a single PROVABLE allegation of Coulter's lying, please make your case. Otherwise, I suggest you STFU.