Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (65311)	1/10/2003 4:45:29 PM
From: tekboy	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I agree with you entirely (although I'd add to your definition of Character the caveat that the decisions are indeed good, truly public-spirited decisions). I just don't feel I have enough to go on yet in determining whether Bush passes that test. Look, calling a spade a spade shouldn't be out of bounds. Everything I said about Bush could have been said about Harry Truman, and the same questions could have been raised--hell, were raised--about him. He was a know-little haberdasher and machine politician who few people thought was up to the job when he had it thrust upon him. And yet in the end, because he had precisely the qualities you mention, he turned out to be one of the greatest presidents in history, and the man who presided over the creation of the stable, benign, dramatically successful international order we're still living in today. If Bush turns out in practice to be another Truman, there'll be nobody happier than yours truly. tb@we'llsee.com

To: LindyBill who wrote (65311)	1/10/2003 7:57:52 PM
From: Rascal	Respond to of 281500

Hey, everybody has a 50/50 shot. You need to worry when the actor begins to believe he can affect the outcome! Rascal@ just flipthecointuntil1/04.com