Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tekboy who wrote (65340)	1/10/2003 8:54:28 PM
From: LindyBill	Respond to of 281500

The third set of factors ("Rove") is clearly important, Woodward indicated that Rove was not getting a seat at the NSC table, and was not involved in the FA decisions. How much he is doing "Back Room" of course, none of us know. We know that Bush trusts his judgement on Domestic, but there is no reason to think he would go to him much on FA. Bush certainly started out wanting to involve Arafat, and I think his decision to cut him out was one of the better FA decisions he has made. TWT.

To: tekboy who wrote (65340)	1/10/2003 9:41:44 PM
From: paul_philp	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

I'm just not sure, unlike you and Nadine, that it comes from the President himself Tekboy, Just to set the record straight, Nadine and I don't discuss Israel very often because we disagree so strongly. Well, we might agree on holding the Arab world accountable for the mess but when it comes to holding Israel accountable, I just don't go there with her anymore. She is kind enough to answer questions when I ask. for the saintly Bush as well as the demon Clinton Hey, wassup with that comment? tb@offtodinner.com Hope it was good. Paul