SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Raptor's Den -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: GrillSgt who wrote (7025)1/13/2003 11:17:18 AM
From: GrillSgt  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10157
 
Looks like we did the fall down to 923 area as projected. 920.75 with the mo overthrow.

We should see a choppy base building process between 921 and 926. We should not see a move back above 930.50 if we are to go lower.



To: GrillSgt who wrote (7025)1/13/2003 1:44:42 PM
From: velociraptor_  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10157
 
That might have been our last spike up this morning...difficult to tell because of all the choppiness so identifying the individual waves gets complex. The pattern though still resembles the terminal ending diagonal and ADX continues to fall again today on this slow rise. The alternate is that this whole mess is still a complex B wave in an abc up which would give us one more spike about mid week, but again this rally should fail like today's and fall back soon after. Once the lower wedge line breaks on this diagonal, we should see some reversal signs. Taking out the low mid last week is confirmation of the reversal.



To: GrillSgt who wrote (7025)1/13/2003 3:47:29 PM
From: gsp6181  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10157
 
GrillSgt - on your "gap rule" I assume that it also applies to gaps down, e.g., you would go short versus "buying" a gap up? How reliable is this? Are there statistics for gap fills versus gap continuations (what you seem to be supporting)? Thanks for the education and excellent calls. -George