Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (342780)	1/13/2003 9:35:32 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 769670

Forget those liberal polls tailored for liberal papers. Check this out: The Waco Whacko is at it AGAIN! Add one MORE Republican Senate seat for 2004... miami.com

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (342780)	1/13/2003 10:35:43 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

What a stupid spin. I read this poll to say 83% of the country agrees with how the administration is proceeding: A robust majority of Americans - 83 percent - would support going to war if the United Nations backed the action and it was carried out by a multinational coalition. Who was it claiming Knight-Ridder wasn't liberal?<ggg>

To: Raymond Duray who wrote (342780)	1/13/2003 10:49:11 PM
From: MSI	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

In spite of the media, anyone who thinks about it realizes it's phony to require Iraq to prove a negative, i.e., "prove you don't have any weapons, or we'll kill you". That's absurd even to a schoolchild. It's clear to everyone that the people who will be killed in Iraq are those who are already the victims of brutal treatment, probably hundreds of thousands will be killed. Without proof of the danger to Americans, no one will believe what we're told in school, that "The US doesn't start wars, it ends them".