SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (157992)1/14/2003 12:59:18 AM
From: hmaly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1590879
 
Ted Re..Huh? Who do you think you're talking to?

The biggest socialist-liberal,Gw hater in WA..

I have not said one word about how the military should conduct itself once it gets to Iraq.

But you have been against the US army going to Iraq, and clearing out the WMD and the terrorist there. Why, to save the job of a dictator who has already killed 1.5 mln people.

One minute you're condemning liberals for having us in a war when not a single shot has been fired,

What are you talking about here?

Once again......I think its a shame that these men and women are sent to fight a war that the rich and powerful think is necessary but would never send their own kids to fight. The hypocrisy smells up this thread.

INteresting theory. Do you think because OBL is rich, we shouldn't retaliate; after all, OBL started the war on 9/11, or are you disputing that also. Do you have a link to prove it, or are you blowing it out your behind again.

Every bushite who commits this nation to war should be required to send at least one relative to help with the fighting. That would bring an end to war real fast.

Really. You think that OBL will stop attacking us then, or Saddam will stop supporting terrorism, or that Kim will turn into a niceguy then. In fact, why don't you show me that any of the dem presdients who were in office when previous wars started, sent their children, or that it is even in the constitution. Link please. Or are you another dem waffeling with silly excuses.



To: tejek who wrote (157992)1/14/2003 1:33:58 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1590879
 
Ted, <Every bushite who commits this nation to war should be required to send at least one relative to help with the fighting.>

How many relatives did you send to Kosovo and Somalia?

Tenchusatsu

P.S. - On another topic, every Clintonite who doesn't believe in tax cuts should be required to pay the same rate as the "rich."



To: tejek who wrote (157992)1/14/2003 8:36:24 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1590879
 
Every bushite who commits this nation to war should be required to send at least one relative to help with the fighting. That would bring an end to war real fast.

1 - Where Clinton supporters who also supported military involvement in the Balkans, Haiti and elsewhere also required to send a relative?

2 - Its a free country. I have no power or right to send someone else to fight. I could sign up my self but it would be pointless, they don't need more people and in 6 months I will be to old to sign up (I think. Its different in different services and may have changed since my time in basic training)

Tim