SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (214391)1/14/2003 9:30:52 AM
From: Wyätt Gwyön  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
chnically they are right, as the bond was eliminated and only notes of 10 years and below will be issued due to mental retardation. Why would we ever want to lock in low rates for a longer period of time?

have no fear--as soon as rates go back over 10%, they'll start issuing 30yrs again like crazy.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (214391)1/14/2003 9:53:23 AM
From: Freedom Fighter  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 436258
 
KT,

>But there are no shortages of Treasury debt looking into the future. And, somewhere along the line, the states and municipalities will have to be bailed out. Dubya can't hide from that problem even in Crawford. We're pushing a $10 billion deficit here, thanks to continued spending levels during a revenue shortfall. <

Absolutely agree on the Federal government. The deficits were going to huge regardless of whether or not we got the tax cuts. The "social promises" will start kicking in in the years to come and the revenues were sure to come up short once the bubble burst. Now that the Fed is out of bullets they are getting desperate trying to prop it all up.

I think this another reason why Greenspan erred. If you accommodate speculative tendencies and create a huge bubble, you create an economic environment that misleads both the private sector and the government.

The last thing we need to do is mislead people in government about their true tax stream because they will always overpromise, overspend, pass the buck, cook the books, and be otherwise irresponsible when it comes to the future. God forbid we make them think things are better than they actually are. The current problems at cities and states are the result of the late 90s.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (214391)1/14/2003 10:17:22 AM
From: Mike M2  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
KT, the congress appropriates the money - the democrats had control for 50+ yrs. I recall hearing that congress spent more than Reagan's budget request in 6 of his 8 years. In other words - the democratic congress felt R wasn't spending enough! Mike