Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (158042)	1/14/2003 8:21:29 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580264

I was talking about late term abortions but I did also make a comment about abortion in general Aren't "Partial Birth Abortions", by definition, late-term? The description of the procedure is barbaric, and I could never comprehend even the most extreme liberals supporting it; it was strange to me even that Clinton and Gore supported it. But I think the term as commonly used always involves a viable fetus. I could be wrong, however.

To: TimF who wrote (158042)	1/14/2003 11:56:43 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580264

I was talking about late term abortions but I did also make a comment about abortion in general. A majority are against late term abortions. Only a minority are against abortions in general being illegal but my comment was the minority was strong enough that it was part of the mainstream rather then some far out fringe view. How would you define an idea as being "part of the mainstream" or "out of the mainstream"? When its the prevailing view.........for an example, I think the prevailing view in this country is against late term abortions. ted