Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Should God be replaced? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: zonder who wrote (14565)	1/16/2003 2:36:04 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 28931

"PARTICLES DO APPEAR OUT OF NOWHERE, BY THEMSELVES" And maggots appear out of nowhere in rotting meat. I suspect strongly that your "nowhere" is actually a somewhere and a something. I thought particles are supposed to be called singularities? Whatever. How did the first singularity to use your phrase, "borrow form a vacuum" that did not yet exist? It's a chicken/egg thing. Even if you are correct about particles manifesting out of an (apparent) vacuum, that does not demonstrate that is how the universe came into existence by a long shot. Every experiment you point to as evidence for your position take place and are contingent on a pre-existing universe. I think I understand what you are saying, I just don't buy it that's all. I don't have to have a degree in quantum mechanics to ask a basic question. If you are saying that the first quantum singularity just jumped into existence on it's own with no outside force or catalyst then you believe in spontaneous generation my friend. I know you don't like that, but that's what it is. Greg