Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kumar who wrote (66631)	1/17/2003 8:43:13 PM
From: Rollcast...	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Way I look at it, if the Iraqi people wanted to get rid of Saddam, they've had a few decades to act on it. They did not. How many decades is dictatorship allowed in your view? As I pointed out earlier - when a government chooses to sponsor anti-US terrorism... the option to accelerate the time table is the US's. under what mandate? Consider it a post 9/11 categorical imperative... file it under self defense or Kandt or something.

To: kumar who wrote (66631)	1/17/2003 9:13:24 PM
From: Still Rolling	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

"Way I look at it, if the Iraqi people wanted to get rid of Saddam, they've had a few decades to act on it. They did not." Ridiculous! Stalin died peacefully in his sleep. How are "the Iraqi people" supposed to "act on it"?