SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : P&S and STO Death Blow's -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: farkarooski who wrote (25013)1/18/2003 12:24:31 PM
From: Softechie  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 30712
 
Another classic essay and research by ZEAL LLC. These guys are damn good!

zealllc.com



To: farkarooski who wrote (25013)1/18/2003 12:53:44 PM
From: DebtBomb  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 30712
 
""this Bush Dividend Plan is the biggest bullshit in financial history ...""

what did you do with your 2001 tax rebate check??

shorted more stocks or added to short funds, right??

enough said, gggggg



To: farkarooski who wrote (25013)1/18/2003 1:07:03 PM
From: DebtBomb  Respond to of 30712
 
Recovery Invisible, Firms Write Off 2003

lmao, chamber's comments:

The chief executive of telecoms equipment giant Cisco, John Chambers, started off the miscalculation season in January 2001, when he said he was confident the downturn could be over in six months even though his clients' businesses had hit a brick wall.

"I believe we're probably talking a two-quarter phenomenon, although it could last longer. I'm talking the first half of this year for most companies in the U.S.," Chambers said then in Davos, Switzerland, where many of the world's business leaders will gather again next week to discuss the future.

biz.yahoo.com

AMSTERDAM (Reuters) - After two years of hoping in vain for a recovery, which many said was only six months away, companies are now writing off all of 2003 and focusing on 2004 for any improvements in their markets.



To: farkarooski who wrote (25013)1/18/2003 3:14:06 PM
From: DebtBomb  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30712
 
Message 18461426



To: farkarooski who wrote (25013)1/19/2003 9:33:42 AM
From: Oral Roberts  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 30712
 
While the Bush plan needs some fine tuning, dividends are taxed as income for the company that gives them and for the person receiving them and double taxation is just plain wrong. Should be a deduction for the company and income for the receiver but it needs to change somehow IMO.