SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : A to Z Junior Mining Research Site -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2766)1/20/2003 11:08:34 AM
From: 4figureau  Respond to of 5423
 
>>we are building the Chinese economy now with fiat dollars printed from desperation and arrogance !!!

WELCOME TO THE USDOLLAR DECLINE VICIOUS CIRCLE
I dont understand why this isnt more widely anticipated
its surprising stubbornness will breed a world monetary crisis<<


Read this:

>>C.banks still favour dollar, gold reserves -survey
Reuters, 01.20.03, 7:36 AM ET

LONDON, Jan 20 (Reuters) - Most central banks have no plans to increase euro holdings of foreign exchange reserves but expect total external reserves to rise further, a survey of 54 central bank reserve managers published on Monday showed. The survey of the central banks, which control foreign exchange assets worth $1.1 trillion -- around half outstanding official-sector reserves -- found that they favour the dollar as the dominant reserve currency and safe-haven gold.

"U.S. dollar-denominated assets remain dominant for all respondents except those from Europe where the euro assets account for 50 percent," said the survey published by Central Banking Publications, for a book "How Countries Manage Reserve Assets".

"There has been a gradual move to increase the proportion of euro assets, but only 20 percent expect this to be taken further in the near future."

The survey showed that 32 out of 40 respondents said they did not plan any increase in euro holdings.

The euro has gained nearly 18 percent <EUR=> against the dollar in 2002 in part helped by speculation that central banks, mostly from Asia, are increasing their foreign exchange reserves held in the European single currency.

SAFE-HAVEN GOLD STILL FAVOURED The survey expected safe-haven gold to retain value as a reserve asset. "The main arguments in its favour...are that it is seen as providing insurance against a possible crisis or catastrophe and that it is not the liability of any country," it said.

"No acceleration of gold sales by central banks is anticipated and some purchases of gold are expected by some. Most take the view central banks will go on selling gold at about the rate seen in recent years."

EVER MORE CONSERVATIVE

It also showed global reserves have risen by 32 percent to $2.14 trillion in 2002 from $1.62 trillion in 1997 and 88 percent of managers surveyed expected the trend would continue.

It attributed the increase to influences resulting from September 11 attacks on the United States in 2001, with a rise in U.S. fiscal spending increasing U.S. government bond supply as well as the desire of many countries to prevent an appreciation of their exchange rates against the dollar.

The dollar has lost around 12 percent of its value on the trade-weighted basis, setting a three-year low <=USD> last week.

The survey found central banks, like other commercial banks, struggled to increase returns in an environment of low nominal interest rates following rate cuts around the globe in the past year or so.

"Holding reserves at all has to be justified, in economic terms, by demonstrating an ability to earn a return consistent with safety and liquidity considerations, as there is an opportunity cost: reserves might be invested with a higher real return in the domestic economy," it said.

At the same time, however, growing uncertainties and the heightened sensitivity to risk are encouraging reserve managers to return to more conservative asset management policies, and to fixed-interest high-quality sovereign debt, such as U.S. Treasury bonds.

The survey showed that diversification of assets outside the traditional classes remained limited, with only 23 percent of banks surveyed being allowed to invest in corporate bonds and 12 percent in developed market equities.

Half of the respondents use derivatives for a variety of reasons including hedging to alter exposure on currency, interest rate or duration, as well as tactical portfolio management.

However, 41 percent of the respondents said they will diversify into corporate bonds in future, with majorities moving to increase weight in agency papers and securitised assets.

"Some expect to invest in hedge funds, emerging market bonds and development market equities," it said.

The details of the book can be found at www.centralbanking.co.uk.

forbes.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2766)1/20/2003 11:29:13 AM
From: 4figureau  Respond to of 5423
 
Bear Roundup:

Data suggest US economy shrank in last quarter
By Peronet Despeignes in Washington
Published: January 17 2003 14:56 | Last Updated: January 18 2003 0:46


The US economy may have contracted in the last quarter of 2002, some Wall Street economists calculated on Friday, following official figures showing a surprise fall in industrial output in December.

The figures revealed that US manufacturing last month extended its deepest three-year slump in two decades while the trade deficit jumped to a new record.

Economists cut their estimates of fourth quarter US economic growth, with JP Morgan Chase among the first to predict that official estimates scheduled for release this month might show the economy shrank outright.

Industrial production contracted by 0.2 per cent in December, the Federal Reserve said, leaving US factory output up less than 1 per cent since January 2000. In no three-year period since 1983 has there been so little growth.
news.ft.com

European fund managers incur heavy losses
By Tony Tassell
Published: January 19 2003 17:11

More than a third of European fund managers were unprofitable in 2002, a survey of McKinsey & Co has estimated.


The survey of 80 European managers with total assets of &#8364;3,300bn (£2,175bn) found 20 per cent suffered "negative profitability" in 2001. McKinsey said given that major equity markets last year fell by 40 per cent and industry costs remained largely stable, this total was expected to rise to 36 per cent. By 2004, McKinsey estimates this could rise to 43 per cent, with middle-sized fund managers hardest hit.
news.ft.com

Japan bankruptcies near record


Record numbers of Japanese companies are taking a tumble

Nearly 20,000 firms went bankrupt in Japan during 2002, the second-highest number of corporate failures since World War II.

And experts predict that this year even more companies will go under, because the government is pushing Japanese banks to adopt stricter accounting standards.

news.bbc.co.uk



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2766)1/20/2003 11:34:38 AM
From: 4figureau  Respond to of 5423
 
The gold game plays on

By Peter Brimelow, CBS.MarketWatch.com
Last Update: 12:02 AM ET Jan. 20, 2003


>>Dow Theory Letters' Richard Russell, who combines deflationism and gold bullishness in a paradoxical but recently successful way, closed his Saturday hotline with this tantalizing hint:

"By the way, after increasing their gold shorts for five consecutive weeks, last week the Commercials dropped their short contracts by 7 thousand to 142 thousand while the small speculators (who tend to be wrong) increased their short positions by 3 thousand contracts to a total of 20 thousand... And with that thought, I'm signing off."

Russell, 78, will be back at his computer this morning, however. He can change his mind. But it looks like the gold game may not be over.<<






NEW YORK (CBS.MW) -- Gold just finished up for the seventh straight week, at $357.20. Overbought? Maybe not.




Mark Hulbert's Hulbert Gold Newsletter Sentiment Index measures the actual exposure to gold recommended by the letters he monitors that follow the metal. As of Friday night, it stood at 46.15 percent.

Which is only about midway in the historic range - it goes from -31.5 percent in late 1997 to a peak of 89.6 percent, achieved when gold broke through $300 at the beginning of last year.

Gold is now more than $50 higher -- its highest point for more than five years. Yet joy is decidedly confined.

Hulbert, with his fascination with contrary opinion, views this as a bullish sign

One particularly interesting gold bear is the Elliott Wave Theorist's Robert Prechter. Based on analysis of data by the Hulbert Financial Digest, he's had several runs of success in a variety of different markets.

Prechter backs up his numerological reading of the esoteric Elliott entrails with unusually wide-ranging macro-thinking. In the mid-1990s, he supported his contention that the short skirt fashion meant speculative excess by publishing a current picture of model Naomi Campbell going down the runway in a sort of G-string, from behind.

At least, I think it was a G-string.

You couldn't really see.

Prechter said this was evidence of "a bottomless top."

Maybe he was a little early. But, hey, who cares?

You got the point.

Forbes Magazine, where I then worked, wouldn't publish the picture anyway. Phooey.

Prechter is currently making a powerful and erudite case for deflation. For 2003, he predicts "the stock market averages declining more than in 2000, 2001 or 2002."

He's recommending "interest-bearing cash equivalents... conservative measures."

Yet he writes, "I am a staunch deflationist but not a dogmatic one. Since I am a technician, the markets ultimately dictate my opinion. As previous reports have made clear, [Elliott Wave Theorist's] forecast two years ago for gold to rally to $360 has been fulfilled... If gold rallies another 10 percent, however, then the presumed bear market rally will actually be the start of a new bull market, challenging or negating my monetary outlook."

Another advisor with a significant record according to the Hulbert Financial Digest has actually made the shift: Michael Burke of Investors Intelligence has officially announced the end of the bear market rally he's been skillfully riding since the summer (See my Oct. 14 column).

Burke says "we look for gold stocks, high-yield bond funds, global bond funds, some foreign stocks, especially telephone issues, some electric utility stocks to be above average performers and to possibly buck the trend. There is also money to be made during this expected decline on the short side of the market."

Dow Theory Letters' Richard Russell, who combines deflationism and gold bullishness in a paradoxical but recently successful way, closed his Saturday hotline with this tantalizing hint:

"By the way, after increasing their gold shorts for five consecutive weeks, last week the Commercials dropped their short contracts by 7 thousand to 142 thousand while the small speculators (who tend to be wrong) increased their short positions by 3 thousand contracts to a total of 20 thousand... And with that thought, I'm signing off."

Russell, 78, will be back at his computer this morning, however. He can change his mind. But it looks like the gold game may not be over.

cbs.marketwatch.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2766)1/21/2003 9:41:05 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5423
 
Bear Roundup:

Analysts at odds over double dip - Rocky MN (1/21/2003 7:11 AM)
rockymountainnews.com

Investors See Few Economic Risks as Government Deficits Around World Rise - Bloomberg (1/21/2003 6:43 AM)
quote.bloomberg.com

Airline industry expects bumpy ride to recovery - USAT (1/21/2003 7:03 AM)
usatoday.com

Airlines' Pension Problems Growing - Wash. Post (1/21/2003 7:06 AM)
washingtonpost.com

Italian January Consumer Confidence Falls to Lowest in More Than Six Years - Bloomberg (1/21/2003 6:41 AM)
quote.bloomberg.com

Hong Kong Consumer Prices Dropped for a 50th Month - Bloomberg (1/21/2003 6:44 AM)
quote.bloomberg.com

China's 2002 Crude Imports Up Despite High Prices - DowJones (1/21/2003 7:06 AM)
story.news.yahoo.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (2766)1/21/2003 11:26:11 AM
From: 4figureau  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5423
 
Leonard Kaplan
Prospector Asset Management

For markets of Tuesday, January 21, 2003

GENERAL COMMENTS:

As the events of the world continue to unfold, usually in a fearful manner, the gold market has rallied sharply these last two weeks to press against technical resistance at the $360 price level. The financial world, which seems to convincingly believe that a war in Iraq is inevitable, has bought the gold market, the oil market, and has pummeled the USD relentlessly. It is clear that everyone is standing on the same side of the rowboat, that we see markets that are clearly dominated by speculative fervor, that now have a very significant "war premium" built into current prices. We clearly have runaway bull markets in gold, oil, and the European currencies. Prices are currently well above fundamental supply/demand "value" and the markets are clearly anticipating perhaps not the worst case, but a very bad one. These are obviously dangerous markets to trade, more so than has been the case for many years. But, the trend in gold is most decidedly higher and more and more mainstream analysts are now touting the ownership of gold, having missed the first $100 move of the bull market.

Trust me, the market is now almost completely dominated by the investor or speculative concern and physical off take is simply awful. Lease rates for gold remain at virtually zero for the shorter-term durations and constructive reports of actual physical demand are virtually impossible to find. Investors and speculators are buying derivatives, or futures, while the actual metal remains unloved and unwanted. This should not be a great surprise, as "paper gold" is so much more cost efficient than the underlying precious metal. But, the downside risks of the gold market have been greatly enhanced not only due to the lack of physical demand at these lofty price levels but the fact that the current price of gold is maintained solely by the psychology of investors and speculators. And we know how quickly that can change.

I would still believe that we would see a retracement in the gold price from our current levels, providing a superb opportunity to get very long this market. Looking at historical data, please note that gold prices plummeted when the USA invaded Iraq and it was clear that the war would be quite short. So, IF there is a war, it becomes likely that gold will fall in price. And IF there isn't a war, it is clear that gold will lose some of its "war premium". Either way, we may go lower. But, there is another possibility and one that the market is screaming to all who listen, that we do go to war and it becomes ugly. These are difficult times to trade. All depends on the news, geopolitical events, and the psychology of the speculator.

I would guess that the best course of action is to own some gold at this juncture, just a bit. Either paid for in full or just slightly leveraged, knowing that you could suffer a loss if the geopolitical situation of the world improves. Or play the futures markets just a bit, using close stops on futures contracts or perhaps even buying bull call spreads. The trend is higher but there is certainly more risk in this market at this time than we have seen in years. While I sincerely detest buying options, perhaps buying bull call spreads in gold, at this time, makes quite a lot of sense at this time as it combines limited risk with excellent potential. Clients of the firm and readers of this commentary are welcome to call to discuss this strategy.

Silver continues to under perform the gold market as its industrial "nature" is now seemingly in charge. Silver, at around $4.80 per ounce, is the same price as when gold was scraping its most recent lows at $300. Gold has risen some 20% since then and silver has barely budged. The gold /silver ratio is now above 74 to 1 and certainly looks to go higher. I do see silver as somewhat undervalued at current price levels, but I would imagine that the upside is sorely limited unless this market begins to see some investor and speculative interest, something that is sorely missing. Silver has donned its "industrial metal" image and significantly higher prices will not be seen until it regains its crown as a "monetary metal", much like its much prettier sister, gold. Until silver can convincingly surpass technical resistance at $5.15 to $5.25, it remains a trading vehicle and is more related to the health of the economic recovery than to the demands of speculative interest.

Platinum and palladium have done very well of late, rallying quite sharply. While some bullish sympathy is, of course, seen with the advancing gold market, these markets are rallying for all the right reasons and their prices do not, in my opinion, carry a large "war premium". The rallies we have seen in these metals have occurred primarily due to fundamental considerations and look to be VERY advantageous for the more conservative investor/speculator at this time. I see the downside risk in these markets as much reduced in comparison to the gold market. Clients of the firm and traders who follow our recommendations are now showing excellent mark-to-the-market profits in these markets and I continue to look for much higher prices.

There has been much talk among traders and analysts of late about the correlation between the values of the shares of the gold producers and the price of gold. While gold remains a dollar or three below its 5-year highs, the gold stocks are still 30-50% off their highs seen earlier last year. It was once strongly believed that the gold stocks PREDICTED, or led, the price of gold, but this correlation is now very dubious. Could it be that the gold shares are telling us that this rally in gold is not to be believed? Doubtful, as gold continues to rally while they falter. What I believe is really happening is a realization of the fact that these two markets are not as positively correlated as many gold bugs would like to believe.

Central Bankers continue to sell gold into the market, thumbing their nose at the humiliating experience of the British Treasury who sold half of their gold reserves at an average of $275, now about $85 less than the current price. Canada, Netherlands, Portugal, and the Swiss sold gold into its rally in December. It seems that the $100 rally in gold only encourages the Central Banks to continue selling their gold reserves even though it is the best performing asset on their books. They are selling their winners, and holding onto their losers such as the USD and equities. This makes very little sense in the current geopolitical environment and speaks volumes about the market "savvy" of these purported professionals. I am frankly amazed that there has been no public outcry from the citizenry of these nations due to the actions of their Central Banks, especially the British.

It would appear that the Central Banks will certainly continue to be sellers into this bull market in gold and that there are few Central Banks willing to add to reserves. Oh yes, China and Russia are adding gold to their reserves but, MOST IMPORTANTLY, they are NOT buying gold in the open market, using hard currencies, but only buying internally produced gold for their native currency. Look, if you were a Central bank, and had the chance to add gold to your reserves for paper money that you could print at will, you would, of course, do it. This is the case with both Russia and China. They are not entering the global market and spending Dollars, they are buying internally produced gold for their local currency, while other Central Banks are selling gold for USD on the open market. It is strictly a one-way street. I would expect continued selling by the Central Banks, perhaps even accelerated as time goes by, and these sales depend upon the willingness of the speculative crowd to buy. However, history teaches us that the Central Banks, who should the sharpest in their knowledge of the markets and of the economy, tend to be sellers at the bottom and buyers at the top. Perhaps they are just leaning against the wind.

Platinum and palladium will most likely go higher next week as the workers at Norilsk, the Siberian concern which produces some 70% of the worlds palladium and about 20% of the global production of platinum are now threatening a strike unless their demands for pay raises and longer vacations are met by management. The union is asking for a raise to a monthly salary of $853 per month, about a 20% raise from current levels.

Gold producers continue to be the MAJOR buyers of gold in this market, far outshadowing the demands of the speculative crowd for physical metal. As per Virtual Metals and Haliburton Mineral Services (sponsored by Rothschild), the international global hedge book, representing some 65% of global production, continued to shrink in the 3rd quarter of 2002 to 2692 tons, falling by some 15 tons. Still, all in all, about 2700 tons, counting just 65% of the total, remain either to be bought in the market to offset gold previously sold forward, or delivered into the market. If mathematically computed to about 3600 tons, this comprises just less than 2 years of total global production of gold, still a really hefty amount. AND, given the fact that stockholders of gold producers now consider ANY hedge to be complete anathema, it would appear that the demand for gold from this sector would continue to be evident. Andy Smith, who has been the most accurate, as well as the most controversial, gold analyst in the business notes that hedge book reductions by just four of the largest gold producers contributed 4.9 Billion USD of gold demand, while purchases of gold eagles, inflows into USA mutual funds that invest in mining concerns and Comex speculators total only $730 Million USD. It is most important to know exactly where the demand is coming from, and it is not the physical marketplace, it is not India or China or Japan, it is from the very gold producers who should, naturally, be sellers of gold who are now forced to be buyers. It certainly is a most strange world.

On to the Commitment of Traders Reports, as of January 14th, for both futures and options:

Gold

Long
Speculative Short
Speculative Long
Commercial Short
Commercial
94,090 28,889 77,934 190,643
+347 +1,341 -428 -3,389
Long Small Spec Short Small Spec . .
78,102 30,595 . .
-884 +1,082 . .

While the ownership of gold futures contracts on the exchange barely budged last week, it is most evident that everyone is standing on the same side of the boat, that the speculative crowd is very long at present. Spec longs have commitments for 17.2 million ounces of gold vs. the speculative shorts with 5.9 million ounces. If, and that is a very big IF, we begin to see a change in investor psychology that forces some long liquidation, we will see a very sharp decline due to the fact that physical demand is nonexistent at these price levels. But, if the news and geopolitical events worsen, gold will go higher. So far, the longs in this market have demonstrated that they will not be shaken out of this easily and their resolve seems quite sturdy. All said earlier, all depends on the news.

It is also worthwhile considering how the internal structure of this market has changed over the past several months. Please understand that no one with an IQ higher his shoe size wants to be short the gold market. Just a little bit of buying of gold pushes it higher than it would, let's say, 6 months ago. This makes for a dangerous scenario IF the longs ever want to get out; there are not natural shorts to sell to. The entire structure has changed.

Silver

Long
Speculative Short
Speculative Long
Commercial Short
Commercial
46,529 8,321 19,924 87,650
-130 +1,457 +2,569 +1,623
Long Small Spec Short Small Spec . .
36,406 6,888 . .
+379 -262 . .

As in gold, there was little change in the ownership of contracts on the exchange during the reporting week. Speculative longs are long 414 Million ounces vs. the speculative shorts at only 76 million ounces. This ratio, at 5.5 to 1 bespeaks the mood of the market as totally one sided. But, silver has not performed well recently and I wonder how much longer the resolve of the long speculators will hold. Clients of the firm and traders who follow our recommendations, are delta neutral in this market and I will wait for lower prices to re-enter.

Platinum

Long
Speculative Short
Speculative Long
Commercial Short
Commercial
5,739 1,275 806 6,716
+632 +3 -506 +178

From the above numbers, it is shocking clear that the large speculative concerns have grabbed hold of this market. The platinum market is very thin, and the funds, with Billions of USD in their coffers, can move prices easily. My sense is that prices are going much higher. Platinum has better fundamentals at this point in time than either gold or silver and I would think that long positions could entail less risk. I also highly recommend palladium for some accounts. Please consult our offices for specific recommendations.

GOLD RECOMMENDATIONS:
Expected trading range $345.00 to $358.00

Good technical support exists around the $349-$350 price level with superb support in the low $340's. The $357-$358 price level has, so far, successfully thwarted all rallies and should be seen as VERY SIGNIFICANT resistance. Day traders should pick their points carefully and use rather tight stops. Staying on the long side makes a whole lot more sense. All movement within this range is almost inconsequential and trades should only be taken against or through these numbers. Expect greatly enhanced volatility and watch the foreign markets carefully. And, of course, the news will make the market. These are dangerous times for day traders especially if you take the short side.

For position traders, the times are difficult to judge. I would like to start buying gold in the $342 range, building a position all the way down to $328, but that may never happen. Lets buy at the numbers listed above, OR buy a bit on a close over $360 using a $4 stop. If gold drops a bit, aggressively sell out of the money puts at $325 or $330 to replace the positions lost to the options we sold. And, now is the time to buy some insurance, buy some bull call spreads, but only in smallish quantities as buying options is rarely a good idea.

SILVER RECOMMENDATIONS:
Expected trading range $4.74 to $4.85

Day traders should be playing the range here. Short positions in silver are a lot less dangerous than short positions in gold it would seem, so when you want to be long, buy gold, and when you want to be short, do it in silver.

Position traders, and traders who follow our recommendations, are now delta neutral on silver, waiting to reestablish long positions at lower prices. On dips, sell out of the money puts.

PLATINUM RECOMMENDATIONS:
Expected trading range $610 to $640

Clients of the firm, and traders who follow our recommendations, are still long both platinum and palladium with superb mark to the market profits. I would be buying more as both markets move into new highs, but only a bit. Platinum looks to want to move to the $640 to $650 range and partial profits should be taken at those price levels. I am long term bullish on palladium and continue to recommend adding, carefully, to positions for a long-term move.

321gold.com